of Mandamus, directing the first respondent herein to regularize the services of the petitioners from their initial dates of appointments till 01.06.2006 with all consequential monetary and service benefits.
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed for a direction to the first respondent herein to
regularize the services of the petitioners from their initial dates of appointments till
01.06.2006 with all consequential monetary and service benefits.
regularize the services of the petitioners from their initial dates of appointments till
01.06.2006 with all consequential monetary and service benefits.
2. It is the case of the petitioners that they were recruited by way of direct
recruitment and during the period between 2003 and 2006, the Teachers Recruitment Board had conducted examinations and forwarded the list of meritorious candidates to the School
Education/Director of Elementary Education for appointment. It is the further case of the petitioners that by way of G.O.Ms.No.55 dated 02.06.2004, an agreement was executed,
stating that the petitioners would not be entitled to regularization for five years and
subsequent thereto, the Government had issued another G.O.Ms.No.99 dated 27.06.2006,
by which, the Government reconsidered the decision of appointing the teachers on
consolidated pay for a period of 5 years and decided to regularize the services of all the
teachers, who were appointed on a consolidated pay vide G.O.Ms.No.100 dated 27.06.2006 by regularizing their services with effect from 01.06.2006. It is the grievance of the petitioners that there was no whisper with regard to regularization of their services between their actual date of appointment and 01.06.2006 and though they sent several representation to the 1 st respondent through their Association, there was no positive response to the representations. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners are before this Court, seeking for a suitable direction to the 1 st respondent.
recruitment and during the period between 2003 and 2006, the Teachers Recruitment Board had conducted examinations and forwarded the list of meritorious candidates to the School
Education/Director of Elementary Education for appointment. It is the further case of the petitioners that by way of G.O.Ms.No.55 dated 02.06.2004, an agreement was executed,
stating that the petitioners would not be entitled to regularization for five years and
subsequent thereto, the Government had issued another G.O.Ms.No.99 dated 27.06.2006,
by which, the Government reconsidered the decision of appointing the teachers on
consolidated pay for a period of 5 years and decided to regularize the services of all the
teachers, who were appointed on a consolidated pay vide G.O.Ms.No.100 dated 27.06.2006 by regularizing their services with effect from 01.06.2006. It is the grievance of the petitioners that there was no whisper with regard to regularization of their services between their actual date of appointment and 01.06.2006 and though they sent several representation to the 1 st respondent through their Association, there was no positive response to the representations. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners are before this Court, seeking for a suitable direction to the 1 st respondent.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Dear Reader,
Enter Your Comments Here...